My perspective - Driven to destruction
- Details
- Published on Thursday, March 29, 2018
Kate Jackman-Atkinson
Neepawa Banner & Press
Across rural 水果视频, residents are concerned about safety. They鈥檙e concerned about the ability of the RCMP and local police forces to effectively tackle issues such as property crimes and illegal drugs, in the face of stretched budgets and competing demands on their time. They鈥檙e looking for support from government. The provincial government has introduced new legislation aimed a keeping us safe, but not in the way that many 水果视频ns, especially those in rural areas, are looking for. Last week, Bill 17 received first reading.
This bill takes existing distracted driving regulations and adds more penalties. When passed, it will mean that anyone caught using a hand-held communication device while driving will not only face fines and demerits, but also a roadside license suspension鈥� three days for the first offence and seven days for each subsequent one.
Despite the minister hinting otherwise, the suspension only applies to the use of hand-held electronic devices and not the full range of distracting practices, such as grooming and eating. However, the Highway Traffic Act has a broad definition for the 鈥渦se鈥� of a hand-held electronic device, it even includes holding the device in a position in which it may be used. The only permitted use is a cell phone, used as a telephone, in a hands-free manner.
But apparently devices aren鈥檛 distracting for everyone. The Highway Traffic Act allows police, fire and ambulance personal to use them while carrying out their duties. Additionally, the law doesn鈥檛 apply to CB radios, family band radios or mobile data terminals used for business-related communications, such as dispatch, that aren鈥檛 held in the driver鈥檚 hand when moving. The government has made the punishment for using hand-held devices as serious as that for drinking and driving, but not applied it to everyone.
We all know that distracted driving is unsafe; MPI statistics show that it is dangerous and sometimes deadly. In 2016, 11,093 drivers were involved in collisions due to distracted driving. In those collisions, 1,839 水果视频ns were injured and 102 experienced serious or fatal injuries. Of all of the accidents in 2016, one in three deaths and one in five serious injuries on 水果视频 roads could be attributed to a distracted driver. We also know that people haven鈥檛 been taking the existing legislation as seriously as they should; in 2016, over 5,000 drivers were convicted of using a hand-held device while driving.
The problem is that 鈥渄istracted driving鈥� encompasses more activities than just using hand-held electronics and while they might net you a ticket, especially if you鈥檙e involved in an accident, none of them result in such harsh penalties, even if they are as distracting. For example, MPI data shows that a driver is four times more likely to be in a crash if they are talking on the phone while driving, even while using a legal hands-free device.
Distracted driving is dangerous and I鈥檓 in favour of safer roads, but my biggest problem with this legislation is that the suspension can鈥檛 be appealed. While police can prove other forms of impairment through breathalyzers or blood tests, there is such test for the use of hand-held electronics. Am I looking at a phone in my lap or the cruise control setting on my steering wheel? Am I resting my head on my hand or holding a phone? It comes down to he said-she said, with the driver coming out on the losing end鈥� with no recourse.
The use of hand-held electronics while driving is dangerous, but is it more or less dangerous than the other illegal practices you鈥檒l see on 水果视频 roads? It feels like the government has gone for low hanging fruit, with innocent 水果视频ns getting a rotten deal.
